🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach and then dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.